« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 3
, Pages 361-368
, June 2003
Evidence-based follow-up of lung cancer patients
References
- . How gravely ill becomes dying: A key to end of life care. JAMA. 1999;282:1670–1672
- . Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:671–679
- Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1992;102:305S–311S
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Adopted on May 16, 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2996–3018
- Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1696–1700
- Is follow-up of lung cancer patients after resection medically indicated and cost-effective?. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1563–1572
- . Follow-up in lung cancer: How often and for what purpose?. Chest. 1999;115:1494–1499
- Relevance of an intensive postoperation follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1185–1190
- Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: A decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA. 2003;289:313–322
- Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: An ethnographic study. West J Med. 2001;174:247–253
- Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1722–1728
- Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention.SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:500–507
- Generalists and oncologists show similar care practices and outcomes for hospitalized late-stage cancer patients: SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks for Treatment. Med Care. 2000;38:1103–1118
- Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prongnsis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279:1709–1714
- Geographic variation in the conduct of patient surveillance after lung cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2940–2949
- Clinical surveillance testing after lung cancer operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1612–1616
- Cancer patients’ perceptions of their disease and its treatment. Br J Cancer. 1988;58:355–358
- . Doc, shouldn’t we be getting some tests?. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2345–2348
- Randomized phase III trial of Docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum containing chemotherapy regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2354–2362
- Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2095–2103
- . Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Descriptive study based on scripted interviews. BMJ. 1998;317:771–775
- Development and evaluation of a decision aid for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Health Expect. 2000;3:125–136
- . Malignant cerebral glioma—I: Survival, disability, and morbidity after radiotherapy. BMJ. 1996;313:1507–1512
- . Malignant cerebral glioma—II: Perspectives of patients and relatives on the value of radiotherapy. BMJ. 1996;313:1512–1516
- Attitudes to chemotherapy: Comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ. 1990;300:1458–1460
- . Cancer patients, doctors and nurses vary in their willingness to undertake cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1917–1918
- The difficult choice of chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8:223–228
- . Who wants second-line, palliative chemotherapy?. Psychooncology. 2001;10:410–418
-
.
At the Will of the Body.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin,; 1991;
- . Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1096–1105
- . Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000;320:469–473
- . Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1587–1592
- Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1593–1597
- . Expectancy or primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:904–911
- . Telling the truth about terminal cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1746–1748
- How long does it take to get a “do not resuscitate” order?. J Palliat Care. 1997;13:5–8
- . Paradoxes in cancer patients’ advance care planning. J Palliat Med. 2000;3:27–35
-
Open access follow-up for lung cancer: Patient and staff satisfaction.
J Clin Oncol. 2001;13:404–408
- Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: Randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313:665–669
-
Follow up in breast cancer: Quality of life unaffected by general practice follow up.
Br Med J. 1995;311:54
- Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:705–710
- Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1227–1233
-
Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: Initial findings from the hotline study.
Br Med J. 1997;314:174–177
- Economic impact of harmonizing medical practices: Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the follow-up of breast cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1718–1724
-
.
Medically appropriate follow-up of breast and lung cancer patients.
ASCO 2002 Educational Book. 2002;652–657
PII: S0093-7754(03)00148-9
© 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 3
, Pages 361-368
, June 2003
