Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 587-595, October 2003

Conservative versus radical therapy of prostate cancer: how have recent advances in molecular markers and imaging enhanced our ability to prognosticate risk?

  • Scott Bagnall

      Affiliations

    • Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Laurence Klotz

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Laurence Klotz, MD, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave #MG 408, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
    • Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

Abstract 

Recent results of several prospective phase II and phase III trials have reinforced the view that many patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer are overtreated. The challenge is to identify those patients who require treatment at a point at which they are still amenable to cure, and to avoid treating those who have indolent disease and those who are incurable. This requires a combination of early detection, accurate imaging, and a selective approach to therapy. The accuracy of serum and tissue biomarkers and new imaging techniques in stratifying patients according to the risk of progression and metastasis is reviewed. The outcome of a strategy of selective intervention in good-risk patients based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time is summarized.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(03)00348-8

doi:10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00348-8

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 587-595, October 2003