Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 567-586, October 2003

Predicting clinical end points: treatment nomograms in prostate cancer

  • Christopher J Di Blasio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Audrey C Rhee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel Cho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Peter T Scardino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Michael W Kattan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Michael W. Kattan, PhD, Departments of Urology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA

Abstract 

Due to the generally indolent nature of prostate cancer, patients must decide among a wide range of treatments, which will significantly affect both quality of life and survival. Thus, there is a need for instruments to aid patients and their physicians in decision analysis. Nomograms are instruments that predict outcomes for the individual patient. Using algorithms that incorporate multiple variables, nomograms calculate the predicted probability that a patient will reach a clinical end point of interest. Nomograms tend to outperform both expert clinicians and predictive instruments based on risk grouping. We outline principles for nomogram construction, including considerations for choice of clinical end points and appropriate predictive variables, and methods for model validation. Currently, nomograms are available to predict progression-free probability after several primary treatments for localized prostate cancer. There is need for additional models that predict other clinical end points, especially survival adjusted for quality of life.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(03)00351-8

doi:10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00351-8

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 567-586, October 2003