Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 616-634, October 2003

Advances in imaging in the postoperative patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen level

  • Hedvig Hricak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Hedvig Hricak, MD, PhD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, C278, New York, NY 10021, USA
  • ,
  • Heiko Schöder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Darko Pucar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Eric Lis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Steven C Eberhardt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Chinyere N Onyebuchi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Howard I Scher

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Abstract 

Imaging prostate cancer continues to represent a clinical challenge for both primary and recurrent disease. In the evaluation of the persistent/recurrent/metastatic prostate cancer, knowledge of cancer location (local v distant), size, and extent are essential in order to design a treatment, tailored to each patient’s needs. There are evidence-based guidelines for the use of imaging in assessing the presence of distant spread of prostate cancer. Radionuclide bone scans and computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or positron emission tomography (PET) supplement clinical and biochemical evaluations (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) for suspected metastatic disease to bones and lymph nodes. There is no consensus about the use of imaging in the evaluation of local tumor recurrence. The use of ultrasound has been limited to biopsy guidance of the prostatic bed, or percutaneous biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes detected on CT or MRI. The use of MRI is evolving. Recent studies indicate that the use of MRI provides valuable information in the evaluation of local tumor recurrence, and nodal and bony metastases. In a patient post-radiation therapy, the method of combining MRI anatomic information with MR spectroscopic metabolic information is evolving. Another modality offering information about anatomy and metabolism of the local disease is PET/CT. The value of PET/CT at present is controversial, but new studies exploring the role of PET/CT in aggressive prostate cancer are promising.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(03)00359-2

doi:10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00359-2

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 616-634, October 2003