Seminars in Oncology
Volume 31, Issue 5 , Pages 653-658, October 2004

Current controversies in the radiotherapeutic management of adult low-grade glioma

  • Edward G. Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Edward G. Shaw, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1030.
  • ,
  • Stephen B. Tatter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • ,
  • Glenn J. Lesser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • ,
  • Thomas L. Ellis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • ,
  • Constance A. Stanton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • ,
  • Volker W. Stieber

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

Over the last decade, the results of four prospective clinical trials of supratentorial low-grade glioma (LGG) in adults have been published. The data from the nearly 1,000 patients treated on these studies are summarized in this presentation, addressing the following three current controversies in the radiotherapeutic management of these patients: (1) optimum timing of radiation therapy (RT); (2) optimum RT dose; and (3) addition of chemotherapy to RT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in these four studies ranged from 58% to 72% and from 37% to 55%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors included extent of surgical resection, histology, tumor size, and age. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 22845 randomized 311 adults to postoperative observation or RT. There was no difference in the 5-year OS rate between the two arms, but the irradiated patients had a significantly improved 5-year PFS rate. EORTC study 22844 randomized 379 adults to low- versus high-dose RT. Similarly, an intergroup study conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) randomized 211 adults to low- versus high-dose RT. There was no difference in the 5-year OS or PFS rates between the two dose groups in either study. A Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study randomized 60 adults with incompletely resected LGG to RT alone or RT plus lomustine (CCNU) chemotherapy. There was no difference in outcome between the two treatment arms. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to define the optimal management strategy for adults with supratentorial LGG. The schemata from recently completed and ongoing LGG studies will be presented.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(04)00329-X

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.07.007

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 31, Issue 5 , Pages 653-658, October 2004