Seminars in Oncology
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 822-826, December 2004

Concomitant radiochemotherapy or accelerated radiotherapy: Analysis of two randomized trials of the French Head and Neck Cancer Group (GORTEC)

  • J. Bourhis

      Affiliations

    • Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology and Statistic Departments, Villejuif, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Professor J. Bourhis, Department of Radiation-Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • G. Calais

      Affiliations

    • Clinique d’Oncologie et de Radiothérapie, CHU Tours, Tours France
  • ,
  • M. Lapeyre

      Affiliations

    • Centre Vautrin, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • J. Tortochaux

      Affiliations

    • Centre Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • ,
  • M. Alfonsi

      Affiliations

    • Clinique Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
  • ,
  • C. Sire

      Affiliations

    • Centre Hospitalier, Lorient, France
  • ,
  • E. Bardet

      Affiliations

    • Centre Gauducheau, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • M. Rives

      Affiliations

    • Centre Val D’aurelle, Montpellier, France
  • ,
  • P. Bergerot

      Affiliations

    • Centre Regaud, Toulouse, France
  • ,
  • B. Rhein

      Affiliations

    • Centre Dolet, Saint-Nazaire,France
  • ,
  • B. Desprez

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Radiothérapie Vannes, France
  • ,
  • GORTEC

In the early 1990s, when conventional radiotherapy (RT) was the standard of care in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), two main options were being tested to improve the efficacy and the therapeutic ratio of RT. The first approach evaluated the effect of adding chemotherapy (CT) simultaneously to RT (RT-CT), while the second approach assessed the effect of modified fractionated RT. To answer these two questions, in 1994, the French Group for Head and Neck Oncology Radiotherapy (GORTEC) initiated two randomized trials. A total of 494 patients were entered in these two parallel phase III multicenter trials comparing conventional RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions) either with concomitant RT-CT (226 patients; 70 Gy in 35 fractions with three cycles of a 4-day regimen comprising carboplatin and 5-flourouracil [5FU]) or with very accelerated RT (268 patients) delivering 64 Gy in 3 weeks. The 5-year overall survival (OS), specific disease-free survival (DFS), and local-regional control rates were improved in favor of simultaneous RT-CT, whereas local-regional control was significantly improved with accelerated RT, along with a marginal effect on OS and DFS. This increased antitumor efficacy was in both cases associated with a marked increase in acute RT-induced toxicity, which was more pronounced with accelerated RT, whereas late effects were marginally increased with the addition of CT and not influenced by accelerated RT. We conclude that both concomitant RT-CT and accelerated RT improved tumor control rates, as compared to conventional RT, along with increased but manageable toxicity. The two regimens are currently being tested in an ongoing randomized study and also being compared to moderately accelerated RT and concomitant CT.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(04)00399-9

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.09.002

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 822-826, December 2004