Seminars in Oncology
Volume 35, Supplement 1 , Pages S1-S17, February 2008

Optimizing Outcomes for Patients With Advanced Disease in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

  • Francis J. Giles

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Medicine, and Chief, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Director of CTRC Institute for Drug Development, San Antonio, TX.
    • These authors contributed equally to the development of this manuscript.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Francis J. Giles, MB, MD, FRCPI, FRCPath, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Director of CTRC Institute for Drug Development, 7979 Wurzbach Road, Suite 400, San Antonio, TX 78229.
  • ,
  • Daniel J. DeAngelo

      Affiliations

    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
    • These authors contributed equally to the development of this manuscript.
  • ,
  • Michele Baccarani

      Affiliations

    • University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • ,
  • Michael Deininger

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • ,
  • François Guilhot

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Investigational Center INSERM, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • ,
  • Timothy Hughes

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia.
  • ,
  • Michael Mauro

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • ,
  • Jerald Radich

      Affiliations

    • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • Oliver Ottmann

      Affiliations

    • Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • ,
  • Jorge Cortes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
    • These authors contributed equally to the development of this manuscript.

The treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has been revolutionized by the development of the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib. The primary target for this drug is the oncogenic BCR-ABL kinase. Five-year survival rates for patients in chronic phase CML is now greater than 80%. Patients who have advanced beyond the chronic phase to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, however, have not faired as well. Progression occurs for a variety of reasons, including late diagnosis, slow response to imatinib, and the development of imatinib-resistant clones. Imatinib resistance has, in part, been addressed with the introduction of the new BCR-ABL inhibitors, namely dasatinib and nilotinib. These drugs have shown efficacy in CML patients with wild-type BCR-ABL and some BCR-ABL mutants that are imatinib-resistant. Unfortunately, some BCR-ABL mutations remain resistant to these therapies and will require the development of alternative treatments, and other mechanisms of imatinib resistance besides BCR-ABL mutation exist. In the future, genetic and pharmacologic tests may allow the clinician to predict response to imatinib. More aggressive therapies are being considered for high-risk patients, including increased dosage of the current tyrosine kinase inhibitors, along with combination therapies. Aggressive therapy holds promise, as the data suggest that responses are improved. Unfortunately, toxicities are also increased, and thus a balance must be found to ensure safety and compliance. This is especially important for young CML patients, who hopefully will remain in remission for decades. Polymerase chain reaction analysis has become of primary importance as a means of assessing disease burden, and given the idiosyncrasies of this technique, standards must be established to allow results to be compared across different institutions. Additionally, the nature of advanced disease is being explored. Intriguingly, genetic analysis of transformed blasts from patients in blast crisis has identified numerous members of the Wnt/B-catenin pathway and JunB as being activated. Increased activity of these pathways correlates with poor response and eventual disease progression. In addition to these data, evidence is emerging associating survival of the quiescent blast cell with Wnt activity, leading to the hope that Wnt inhibitors will increase the likelihood of eradicating these cells. Other areas such as microRNA profiling and DNA methylation patterns are likely to provide important information.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-7754(07)00271-0

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.12.002

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 35, Supplement 1 , Pages S1-S17, February 2008