Seminars in Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 108-117, April 2008

The Role of Surgery in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors

  • Iman Feiz-Erfan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
    • Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ.
  • ,
  • Laurence D. Rhines

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • ,
  • Jeffrey S. Weinberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Jeffrey S. Weinberg, MD, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neurosurgery, PO Box 301402–Unit 442, Houston, TX 77230-1402.

The role of surgery in the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors causing epidural compression traditionally consisted of posterior decompression. This procedure plus radiotherapy, however, could not be demonstrated to provide any benefit over radiotherapy alone, and surgery fell into disfavor in managing metastatic vertebral tumors. The advent of newer, more sophisticated approaches, along with improved spinal instrumentation and reconstruction techniques, which allowed direct decompression of neural elements and resection of the tumor, have revived the use of surgery in these tumors. These modern spinal surgery techniques, in combination with radiotherapy, have yielded significantly superior functional outcomes and prolonged survival in symptomatic metastatic epidural compression when compared to radiotherapy alone. Management of spinal metastases is evolving, and a multitude of factors determine the indication for and the technique and goals of surgical intervention. Between 1993 and 2005, 21.1% of patients with metastatic spinal tumors evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were treated surgically by the Department of Neurosurgery. The most common spinal metastasis operated upon was metastatic kidney cancer (31.5%), even though kidney cancer was only the third most common primary tumor (after lung and breast cancers) giving rise to vertebral metastases observed during the same time period at this institution. This highlights the importance of the histology of the primary cancer (among other factors) in determining the indication for surgical intervention.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All work was done at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Dr Feiz-Erfan has received research grant from Zimmer Spine. Dr Rhines is a counsultant for DePuy Spine.

PII: S0093-7754(07)00274-6

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.12.005

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 108-117, April 2008