Seminars in Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 460-467, October 2009

Relative Lack of Conditional Survival Improvement in Young Adults With Cancer

  • Archie Bleyer

      Affiliations

    • St. Charles Medical Center, Bend, OR
    • Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Archie Bleyer, MD, St. Charles Medical Center, 2500 NE Neff Rd, Bend, OR 97701
  • ,
  • Mehee Choi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
  • ,
  • C. David Fuller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
    • Graduate Division of Radiological Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • Charles R. Thomas Jr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
  • ,
  • Samuel J. Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
    • Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR

Cancer prognosis is usually reported in terms of survival from time of diagnosis. For patients surviving a period of time after diagnosis, conditional survival (CS) accounts for changing risk over time. This report provides information on how CS in cancer patients changes as a function of age at diagnosis. Using data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, we examined survival for patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2002. The average annual percent change (AAPC) in CS during the first 5 years after diagnosis was evaluated for the 14 most common cancers occurring in young adults, defined as 15- to 39-year-olds, and how they compared with cancers that are more common in older and younger patients. For all cancers, young adult patients had less CS improvement over time than younger or older patients, and this difference was most pronounced in those aged 20 to 29 years (45% below the mean). Eleven of the 14 most common cancers in 15- to 39-year-olds either had a lower CS improvement after diagnosis than either younger or older patients, or than just the older patients. Young adults with leukemia had the greatest improvement in CS over time. In conclusion, young adults with cancer have not enjoyed the same improvement in CS over time compared with other age groups. Explanations for this deficit include the biologic nature of the type of cancers in young adults and less effective therapies for patients in the age group. Regardless of the reasons, the deficit is yet another challenge faced by young adult patients that merits further study.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A preliminary report of this work was published as an abstract in the 2006 Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.Supported in part by the Aflac Foundation.

PII: S0093-7754(09)00139-0

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.07.004

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 460-467, October 2009