Seminars in Oncology
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 39-46, February 2010

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Comparison of Two Widely Used Prognostic Calculators

  • Aditya Bardia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Charles Loprinzi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Charles Loprinzi, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • ,
  • Axel Grothey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Garth Nelson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Steven Alberts

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Smitha Menon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Stephan Thome

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preventive Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
  • ,
  • Sharlene Gill

      Affiliations

    • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Dan Sargent

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Two Web-based prognostic calculators (Adjuvant! and Numeracy) are widely used to individualize decisions regarding adjuvant therapy among patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer. However, these tools have not been directly compared. Hypothetical scenarios were formulated for the Numeracy calculator based on all potential combinations of age, lymph nodes status, tumor stage, and grade of tumor. These were then applied to three postsurgical therapy choices: observation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin chemotherapy) to obtain the predicted 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the numerical predictions between the Adjuvant! and Numeracy calculators for each combination. A total of 192 hypothetical patient scenarios were obtained. For these patients, DFS and OS predictions from Adjuvant! were statistically significantly different than Numeracy (P <.05), except for four of 144 categories. While the estimated benefit in DFS and OS for 5-FU compared to surgery obtained from Adjuvant! and Numeracy were similar, the benefit in DFS and OS for FOLFOX over 5-FU, obtained from the Adjuvant! tool was slightly lower than that estimated from Numeracy. Among patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer, the DFS and OS estimates obtained from Numeracy and Adjuvant!, regarding the benefit of 5-FU over surgery, are similar, but the benefits of FOLFOX over 5-FU differ. Validation studies are needed to clarify the discrepancy and to assess the accuracy of these tools for predicting actual patient outcomes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by the following United States National Institutes of Health Grant-CA 124477 (PI Charles Loprinzi, MD).

PII: S0093-7754(09)00230-9

doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.005

Seminars in Oncology
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 39-46, February 2010